Comments for Blog Sabbath http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com Dancing on the ashes of that which has yet to be burned Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:28:30 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Permanomics 101 by Jack http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/to-coin-a-phrase/#comment-68 Jack Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:28:30 +0000 http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-68 I wouldn't mind being a tenant of Permanomics, sounds like a good place to live! Thanks for the post! I wouldn’t mind being a tenant of Permanomics, sounds like a good place to live! Thanks for the post!

]]> Comment on Permanomics 101 by Tenants of Permanomics http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/to-coin-a-phrase/#comment-67 Tenants of Permanomics Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:34:58 +0000 http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-67 [...] http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/to-coin-a-phrase/ Comments [0]Digg it!Facebook [...] [...] http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/to-coin-a-phrase/ Comments [0]Digg it!Facebook [...]

]]> Comment on Groupwork by circadia http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/effective-leadership/#comment-47 circadia Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:30:22 +0000 http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-47 Thank you Nico and Jonathan for your comments. I'm surprised that anyone stumbles into this blog at all; it's really little more than a weekly time capsule of where my head is at. Sometimes I lok back at my own posts and scratch my head a bit. Thank you Nico and Jonathan for your comments. I’m surprised that anyone stumbles into this blog at all; it’s really little more than a weekly time capsule of where my head is at.

Sometimes I lok back at my own posts and scratch my head a bit.

]]> Comment on Groupwork by Jonathan http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/effective-leadership/#comment-46 Jonathan Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:55:40 +0000 http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-46 Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit. cheers, Jonathan. Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.

cheers, Jonathan.

]]> Comment on Groupwork by nicomorelli http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/effective-leadership/#comment-36 nicomorelli Wed, 21 May 2008 06:51:17 +0000 http://blogsabbath.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-36 You are right. Beside the nicest perspectives provided by cooperative approaches, the reality is very hard, it is hard, I think to facilitate a co-production process taking into account the multiplicity of interests and points of view of the various actors, but I'm still convinced that this way of doing brings better results than a verticalised-hierarchical approach. I'm not convinced about the similarity between this approach and the corporate mindset, because in a corporate perspective this approach is very inefficient, it includes a series of trial and errors cases, it opens to the possibility for individual actors to make mistakes. It is redundant in the way resources are used. A corporate approach doesn't admit errors and waste of resource. Perhaps your stress (I'm just guessing now) is due to your concern that the development of this "messy" system into the write direction does not takes to many blind paths. In your leading position I would be worried, as well, but did you try to see the development from a different perspective? Does it look as hard as you describe it? Thanks for you comment on my blog! You are right. Beside the nicest perspectives provided by cooperative approaches, the reality is very hard, it is hard, I think to facilitate a co-production process taking into account the multiplicity of interests and points of view of the various actors, but I’m still convinced that this way of doing brings better results than a verticalised-hierarchical approach. I’m not convinced about the similarity between this approach and the corporate mindset, because in a corporate perspective this approach is very inefficient, it includes a series of trial and errors cases, it opens to the possibility for individual actors to make mistakes. It is redundant in the way resources are used. A corporate approach doesn’t admit errors and waste of resource. Perhaps your stress (I’m just guessing now) is due to your concern that the development of this “messy” system into the write direction does not takes to many blind paths.
In your leading position I would be worried, as well, but did you try to see the development from a different perspective? Does it look as hard as you describe it?
Thanks for you comment on my blog!

]]>